127,021 to 127,030 of 131,188 Results
Plain Text - 596.0 KB -
MD5: 445c89d7372ae0a85d44049a9b46fe29
Raw data for monolinguals (experiment 1) |
Plain Text - 5.3 KB -
MD5: 0fbe8784f28b26c71b05bf15d283b4f0
Reading key for raw data |
Adobe PDF - 165.7 KB -
MD5: 1a476fa14180bc9648b348f6172fa8c7
Test items for bidialectals (experiment 2) |
Adobe PDF - 376.6 KB -
MD5: 7e7391feb65c125d7d74149860940a43
Test items for monolinguals (experiment 1) |
Jun 28, 2019 -
Replication Data for: What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it really does)
Plain Text - 4.6 KB -
MD5: 78842a392d76e1c5ed8737ee339e8fdd
The description of the data |
Jun 28, 2019 -
Replication Data for: What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it really does)
R Syntax - 8.3 KB -
MD5: dac75d908a53a66587c48c046b427a50
R code for Eng1 |
Jun 28, 2019 -
Replication Data for: What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it really does)
Plain Text - 157.1 KB -
MD5: c3b9ad2b8378c9c430907377fe2a6788
Each researcher’s independent analysis of the lexical demarcation and metaphorical status of each word in the sample |
Jun 28, 2019 -
Replication Data for: What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it really does)
R Syntax - 8.3 KB -
MD5: 862a799688149a05049774fe58edad9f
R code for Eng2 |
Jun 28, 2019 -
Replication Data for: What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it really does)
Plain Text - 156.5 KB -
MD5: 776e6d53317fcb036b60fc3d527cb2a2
A second analysis of the same texts by the same three researchers, carried out after a comparison of responses in Eng 1 |
Plain Text - 5.6 KB -
MD5: c8619142428d840353323fbf2247d2ca
The description of the data |
