130,861 to 130,870 of 130,876 Results
Jun 16, 2014 -
Why Russian Prefixes Aren’t Empty
Plain Text - 1.2 KB -
MD5: 4ef97f730a49bc25e603b468794a4261
The first thing the R script does is to give you a summary of the dataset. Scroll up to the top of the results and you will find a table that looks like this: CONSTRUCTION VERB REDUCED PARTICIPLE goal : 871 _zero:393 no :1353 no : 895 theme:1049 na :368 yes: 567 yes:1025... |
Jun 16, 2014 -
Why Russian Prefixes Aren’t Empty
Comma Separated Values - 3.4 KB -
MD5: cf05fcf112f6b14aef44363cfc6f3f09
In Chapter 5 we look at simplex verbs that have two or more Natural Perfectives formed by attaching prefixes. When a simplex verb uses more than one prefix to form Natural Perfectives, we call this “prefix variation”. For example if you look up грузить/ gruzit’ ‘load’ in the Ožeg... |
Jun 16, 2014 -
Why Russian Prefixes Aren’t Empty
Plain Text - 96.5 KB -
MD5: 7e204860460fb3d016f3c453249ecbf3
Aspectual Triplets: An aspectual triplet is a set of three verbs, consisting of a simplex verb, a prefixed Natural Perfective, and a secondary imperfective derived via suffixation of the Natural Perfective. All three verbs have the same lexical meaning and the members of a tripl... |
Jun 16, 2014 -
Replication data for: Russian nu-drop verbs
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 2.0 MB -
MD5: 8c66b2eada8d0d23f64fe36c269c371d
Perfective Gerunds from -eret' verbs in Russian |
Jun 16, 2014 -
Replication data for: Russian nu-drop verbs
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 27.3 MB -
MD5: 9964000eecfc1d5dd26254dccb658b07
Nu-drop database |
Jun 13, 2014 - TROLLing
Janda, Laura A., 2014, "Metonymy in Word-Formation: Russian, Czech, and Norwegian", https://doi.org/10.18710/1GNZSC, DataverseNO, V1
Publication abstract: A foundational goal of cognitive linguistics is to explain linguistic phenomena in terms of general cognitive strategies rather than postulating an autonomous language module (Langacker 1987: 12-13). Metonymy is identified among the imaginative capacities of... |
Jun 13, 2014 -
Metonymy in Word-Formation: Russian, Czech, and Norwegian
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 282.5 KB -
MD5: b3abaf47f0d2709306156a28f7298e72
Charts based on the data in the databases. R=Russian, C=Czech, N=Norwegian, P&G refers to the study by Peirsman and Geeraerts 2006 cited in the article. met des = metonymy designation (how many metonymy patterns a suffix has) |
Jun 13, 2014 -
Metonymy in Word-Formation: Russian, Czech, and Norwegian
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 114.0 KB -
MD5: 28f8ea3059c113974e55d8bb3ea64c62
More charts and comparisons based on the databases. uni = unidirectional metonymy (source-target relationship is not reversed) |
Jun 13, 2014 -
Metonymy in Word-Formation: Russian, Czech, and Norwegian
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 117.5 KB -
MD5: 4f1441a18a3fe9ae6b12974d61351d86
This file contains analysis of the data in Czech database info2.xls. vehicle=source, taut=tautological relationship (source/vehicle=target), uni=unidirectional relationship (not reversible), bi=bidirectional relationship |
Jun 13, 2014 -
Metonymy in Word-Formation: Russian, Czech, and Norwegian
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 196.0 KB -
MD5: 2e039be22e019250e98fa4cde7f2772e
This is the data base of word-formational metonymy designations for Czech. Found in Geeraerts?=whether the type is found in the article by Peirsman & Geeraerts 2006 cited in the article |
